<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.pbs.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>XChange - The NBR Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/</link>
      <description>XChange is Nightly Business Report's Blog.  Stop by the XChange to read what NBR's reporters, producers, and achors have to say about a variety of business news topics.  Some of the XChange's "hot" topics include energy, real estate, investing, technology, and goverment regulation.  Once you've read the entries from NBR's authors, post your comments.  </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:52:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.24-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

































      <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.pbs.org/pbs/nbr-blog" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.pbs.org/pbs/nbr-blog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.pbs.org%2Fpbs%2Fnbr-blog" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
         <title>The Gift of Lifeway Foods</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Diane Eastabrook" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/eastabrook.jpg" width="95" height="119" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Julie and Edward Smolyansky have come a long way since that July day I interviewed them back in 2002.  It was less than a month after their 55-year-old father, Michael, died suddenly of a heart attack.  The siblings were left to run the company he founded, Lifeway Foods.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At that time Julie was 26, Edward was 22.  Both looked their age, but they also had a maturity well beyond their years.  That maturity served them well.  In the 7 years since Michael Smolyansky died, sales at Lifeway Foods have grown from $12 million a  year to nearly $60 million.  The sister and brother also expanded the company's plant, and moved the executive offices to another facility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/R5YBFYhsQ8A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/R5YBFYhsQ8A/the_gift_of_lifeway_foods.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_gift_of_lifeway_foods.html</guid>  
















































<category>Diane Eastabrook, Chicago Bureau Chief</category>
















































         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:52:30 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Diane Eastabrook, Chicago Bureau Chief </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_gift_of_lifeway_foods.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Science President?</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Steven Horwitz" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/horwitz_95x119.jpg" width="95" height="119" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;During his campaign for the presidency, Barack Obama promised that, in contrast to his predecessor, his presidency would be a "science presidency."  In his first year, Obama may well have taken some science more seriously than his predecessor, but one set of settled scientific research he has chosen to ignore has been the economics of the minimum wage.  The result has been a nightmare for young workers, especially young workers of color.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Economic theory predicts that raising the minimum wage will cause those employees who are least productive to lose their jobs.  If we raise the minimum wage from, say, $6 to $7, it's the same thing as saying "any worker who cannot produce $7 worth of value each hour is not worth hiring."  Younger workers are, of course, among the least skilled in the economy.  In addition, thanks to poor schools and historical discrimination, young workers of color are over-represented in this category.  Higher minimum wages should disproportionately affect young workers and especially ones of color.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/hvxymE9xCp8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/hvxymE9xCp8/the_science_president.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_science_president.html</guid>  
















































<category>Steven Horwitz, Guest Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:54:23 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Steven Horwitz, Guest Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_science_president.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>That Holiday Rush </title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Power Town" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/Power_Town-175x125.jpg" width="175" height="125" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The calendar in Washington is about to give new meaning to the concept of holiday stress. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;December, normally a time when Washington kicks back and recovers from the legislative grind, is about to become one of the busiest months in memory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday President Obama heads to West Point to unveil his Afghan war strategy.  This will be costly -- Afghanistan is now edging out spending for Iraq -- and may send the the price tag up to levels not seen since the surge in Iraq.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then there is a job summit at the White House on Thursday.  Look for this to increase expectations for a mini-stimulus in 2010. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then there is the climate change news.  The world will gather in Copenhagen to discuss a new treaty on Climate Change. They won't finish the job, but they are expected to make progress.  And President Obama will join them on the 9th.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Did I mention health care?  The senate is moving forward with debate up until Christmas on the most sweeping overhaul of health care ever. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Depending on your point of view, Washington will either leave many gifts under the nation's political Christmas tree by the time it heads home or many lumps of policy coal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/8GGZgK9K0k4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/8GGZgK9K0k4/that_holiday_rush.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/that_holiday_rush.html</guid>  
















































<category>Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief</category>
















































         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:06:11 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/that_holiday_rush.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Instant Info</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Harry Lin, CEO Lottay.com" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/harry_lin_guest_blogger.jpg" width="95" height="116" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Authored by Harry Lin, CEO of Lottay.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a world where Google, Wikipedia, and Twitter can tell you almost anything almost instantly, are we smarter or dumber than we've ever been?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think about these examples:  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- You're with a group of people and the question comes up, "When is daylight savings time?"  Someone whips out their iPhone and Googles the answer.  They can even tell you which countries follow daylight savings and which don't.  This info takes about 60 seconds to find, and you could be anywhere, as long as there's Internet connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/Qnv0rVJvPW0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/Qnv0rVJvPW0/instant_info.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/instant_info.html</guid>  
















































<category>Guest Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:02:28 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Guest Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/instant_info.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Becoming a Landlord: the Nitty-Gritty</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Jeff Brown" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/JeffBrownBioPic_100x115.jpg" width="100" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;So, let's say you've ignored the &lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/want_to_be_a_landlord_take_it.html"target="_blank"&gt;red flag&lt;/a&gt; I waved the other day. You want to be a landlord despite the mountain of aggravation I went to so much trouble to describe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Okay, let's get down to some of the nitty-gritty financial issues. But first a caveat: These matters are terribly complex, and I'll offer just a bird's-eye view that misses lots of exceptions and special circumstances. Taxes are a nightmare, and you should study &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p527.pdf"target="_blank"&gt;IRS Publication 527&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/NmX3kViSHVE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/NmX3kViSHVE/becoming_a_landlord_the_nitty-gritty.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/becoming_a_landlord_the_nitty-gritty.html</guid>  
















































<category>Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:27:46 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/becoming_a_landlord_the_nitty-gritty.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Careers for the Next Decade: The Importance of Thinking Ahead</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Jack Kahn" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/kahn.jpg" width="95" height="119" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Career counselors are often quick to recommend fields where a personnel shortage currently exists.  That seems logical...after all, shouldn't you train for positions where the jobs are?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps not.  Take the teaching profession.  For years, it was chronically understaffed--so thousands of students and mid-life career changers decided to train to become teachers. But just as they got their certification, the economy went into recession.  With declining tax revenues, school districts began laying off teachers.  Now there are now too many qualified teachers and not enough openings. The shortage of teachers has turned into a glut.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To help you avoid falling into that trap, we're profiling four up-and-coming careers in our &lt;a href="/nbr/site/features/special/careers-for-the-next-decade/"&gt;Thanksgiving Day program&lt;/a&gt;.  Our consultant, Dr. Marty Nemko, says each meets two criteria: 1) it should grow in demand in the coming years 2) it is still largely undiscovered.   One is &lt;strong&gt;"Patient Advocate."&lt;/strong&gt;  Never heard of it?  That's the idea.  As Marty put it: "Everyone knows there's going to be a great need for physicians' assistants and nurse practitioners.  But most people have never read about a patient advocate.  It's under the radar--so the competition may be less rigorous." And a bonus is that becoming a patient advocate requires far less training than most other medical specialties.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/VMb8Q1Di3ic" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/VMb8Q1Di3ic/careers_for_the_next_decade_th.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/careers_for_the_next_decade_th.html</guid>  
















































<category>Jack Kahn, Director of Program Development</category>
















































         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:55:34 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Jack Kahn, Director of Program Development </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/careers_for_the_next_decade_th.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Freefalling State Revenues Mean Higher Taxes, Tuition, Ahead</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Terri Cullen" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/TerriCullenbiopic_100x115.jpg" width="100" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The Dow Jones Industrial Average is on its way to posting another triple-digit gain Monday, as more encouraging data on the housing market boost hopes that happy days are here again for the U.S. economy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tell that to state governments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;State tax revenues have been in a freefall over the last year -- the steepest drop in tax collections seen in more than 50 years. Overall state tax revenues dropped 10.7% in the third quarter, compared to the same period a year earlier, in the 44 states providing tax data to the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York. (Find the complete report &lt;a href="http://www.rockinst.org/pdf/government_finance/state_revenue_report/2009-11-23-State_Revenue_Flash.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/hFOV3ThzD1o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/hFOV3ThzD1o/low_state_revenues_bad_for_taxes.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/low_state_revenues_bad_for_taxes.html</guid>  
















































<category>Terri Cullen, Economy and Markets Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:29:09 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Terri Cullen, Economy and Markets Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/low_state_revenues_bad_for_taxes.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Cost Containment and the Senate Health Care Debate </title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Power Town" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/Power_Town-175x125.jpg" width="175" height="125" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let's face it, cutting costs is as much fun as dieting.  Maybe less. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which may explain why health care reform is such a daunting topic. The Senate bill that is facing a key procedural vote on Saturday is filled with complex policies to "bend the cost curve" on health care.  There is a commission on costs, a tax on high-cost insurance plans, and a variety of new payment options for medicare. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The complexity implies more certainty than reality to the health care cuts.  Congress is changing incentives and putting in place new structures that have a chance to save money, but are not proven to do so.  It is hard to tell the voters that we have to try to cut costs, but don't really know how to do so.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other issue, of course, is that the Senate bill expands coverage to millions of Americans.  Budget hawks worry about combining guaranteed access with uncertain savings.  Progressives fire back that it is unfair to squeeze out costs without first bringing everyone into the system.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These are the real issues.  I wonder how much they will be debated this weekend?  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/e7_UwBmp8No" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/e7_UwBmp8No/cost_containment_and_the_senat.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/cost_containment_and_the_senat.html</guid>  
















































<category>Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief</category>
















































         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/cost_containment_and_the_senat.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Health Care: The Filibuster</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Scott Gurvey" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/GURVEY_web.jpg" width="95" height="119" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;There's a great line in an early scene of the musical "1776". Richard Henry Lee of Virginia has introduced a resolution declaring the 13 colonies "free and independent states" and the Second Continental Congress is deciding if it should consider the proposal and open debate. A tied vote is broken by Stephen Hopkins of Rhode Island, who declares, "In all my years I never seen, heard, nor smelled an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't even be talked about. Hell yes. I'm for debating anything."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There were no transcripts of the proceedings of the Continental Congress. Playwrights Sherman Edwards and Peter Stone used writings by and about the founders for much of the dialog, but I've never been able to find anything to prove that Hopkins really said that, or anything resembling it. Still, even if we do not know what the founders said, we know what they did. They did debate and approve the resolution, even though their action put them individually at grave personal risk as it moved their constituants from insurrection to outright war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/jPALRKxHRT8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/jPALRKxHRT8/health_care_the_filibuster.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/health_care_the_filibuster.html</guid>  
















































<category>Scott Gurvey, New York Bureau Chief</category>
















































         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:23:09 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Scott Gurvey, New York Bureau Chief </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/health_care_the_filibuster.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Richard Branson and the "It" Factor</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Jeff Yastine" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/yastine.jpg" width="95" height="119" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;After meeting billionaire Richard Branson in the flesh for the first time on Thursday, a line of dialogue from the 1962 movie "Gypsy" comes to mind: "In this business, you either have it -- or you've had it."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The "it" is...charisma? Charm? Star Quality? In the best sense of the phrase, perhaps it's a "cult of personality" -- that ability of one individual to rally a group of people, all with their own opinions and personalities, and glue them together in a way that allows the achievement of seemingly impossible business goals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Branson's name is usually mentioned in the same breath as another word: entrepreneur. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/qccz3eZMzfg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/qccz3eZMzfg/richard_branson_and_the_it_fac.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/richard_branson_and_the_it_fac.html</guid>  
















































<category>Jeff Yastine, Senior Correspondent</category>
















































         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:42:25 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Jeff Yastine, Senior Correspondent </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/richard_branson_and_the_it_fac.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Huh? Prices are down?</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Erika Miller 2" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/miller-blog-96x115.jpg" width="96" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Official government data says consumer inflation has fallen .2% in the past year.  I don't know about you, but it doesn't seem to me like prices are falling. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It came as a total surprise to me that grocery prices have fallen nearly 3 percent in the past year, one of the biggest category declines.  I would have guessed prices at the supermarket were up. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But it turns out, prices for nearly every aisle have been coming down, including beef, milk, eggs and fruit.  If you're curious about the exceptions, they're breakfast cereals, sugar and carbonated drinks. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which brings us back to my question, why haven't shoppers noticed such widespread price declines?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/nHA44Almm84" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/nHA44Almm84/huh_prices_are_down.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/huh_prices_are_down.html</guid>  
















































<category>Erika Miller, Correspondent</category>
















































         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:42:39 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Erika Miller, Correspondent </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/huh_prices_are_down.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Want to be a Landlord? Take it from Me: Just Say No!</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Jeff Brown" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/JeffBrownBioPic_100x115.jpg" width="100" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Tales from my 20 years as a landlord: One former tenant phoned months after disappearing into the night -- and leaving a horrific mess -- to berate me for letting the city junk the broken-down car he'd abandoned out front.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another tenant called to have me referee a dispute with a plumber. I could hear his wife and the plumber screaming so viciously in the background that I thought about calling 911.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, of course, I had tenants who fell behind in the rent, racked up huge, unnecessary repair bills, clogged the toilet with latex objects, set up meth labs in the basement and used the disposal to get rid of dead bodies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Okay, those last two weren't real -- just the stuff of my nightmares. Every single night.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/0y49qVTUp1Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/0y49qVTUp1Y/want_to_be_a_landlord_take_it.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/want_to_be_a_landlord_take_it.html</guid>  
















































<category>Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:17 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/want_to_be_a_landlord_take_it.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Evolution of Goldman's Apology </title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Power Town" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/Power_Town-175x125.jpg" width="175" height="125" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The Goldman Sachs apology has been evolving over time.  Here is what Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein told me at the White House in March:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt; "There was no doubt there was bad behavior and over leverage on Wall Street, like there was over leverage in every aspect of the economy."  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In June, here is what Blankfein said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; "We participated in the market euphoria and failed to raise a responsible voice.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This week:  &lt;blockquote&gt;We're a leader in our industry and we participated in things that are clearly wrong and we have reasons to um, regret and apologize for and we're subject to. And some of this is real and some of this is extrapolated, but all of it can't be good for a firm that has to...for a financial service firm that sells its reputation in part that we will take care of your needs and not draw attention to ourselves.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/T7WRCoi1faI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/T7WRCoi1faI/the_goldman_sachs_apology_has.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_goldman_sachs_apology_has.html</guid>  
















































<category>Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief</category>
















































         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:38:08 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Darren Gersh, Washington Bureau Chief </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/the_goldman_sachs_apology_has.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Why Weak Home Construction Hampers Recovery</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Terri Cullen" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/TerriCullenbiopic_100x115.jpg" width="100" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Seems like every day there's new data out that suggest the U.S. economy is sputtering back to life, but one important driver of economic growth -- new home construction -- continues to hamper the recovery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Housing starts tumbled 10.6% in October to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 529,000 from a month earlier, the Commerce Department reported. The number startled economists, who'd forecast a 1.7% increase in new home groundbreakings. The disappointing October report followed September's 0.5% increase, which also came in well below economists expectations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why is new home construction so important to the economy? Historically, housing starts are among the first indicators to show strength in the early stages of an economic recovery. (Housing starts are the total number of new housing units -- single-family homes and multi-family apartment buildings -- that have begun to be built in any given period.) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/ANbjVU74TjA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/ANbjVU74TjA/why_weak_home_construction_ham.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/why_weak_home_construction_ham.html</guid>  
















































<category>Terri Cullen, Economy and Markets Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:25 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Terri Cullen, Economy and Markets Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/why_weak_home_construction_ham.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Retirement Planning: Two Rules and Some Frightening Numbers</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Jeff Brown" src="http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/nbr_images/JeffBrownBioPic_100x115.jpg" width="100" height="115" class="mt-image-none" style="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Ever hear of the Rule of 72? How about the Rule of 300?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are easy ways to get a rough idea of whether your investments will grow big enough for your retirement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I say "rough," I mean &lt;em&gt;very &lt;/em&gt;rough. But there's no perfectly precise alternative, because all projections rely on guesswork about investment return, inflation and the number of years you'll be retired. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~4/9oF6qC-0AlY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.pbs.org/~r/pbs/nbr-blog/~3/9oF6qC-0AlY/retirement_planning_two_rules.html</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/retirement_planning_two_rules.html</guid>  
















































<category>Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger</category>
















































         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:03:15 -0500</pubDate>
	<author>Published by: Jeff Brown, Personal Finance Blogger </author>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/nbr/blog/2009/11/retirement_planning_two_rules.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
